Aspartame: A killer in disguise
The official narrative of the regulators
1. Regulatory Approval and Safety
- FDA and Global Agencies: Aspartame has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and many other regulatory agencies worldwide, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the World Health Organization (WHO). These agencies have set acceptable daily intake (ADI) levels, which are well above the typical consumption by most people.
- Extensive Research: Over 90 studies have been conducted on aspartame, with many supporting its safety when consumed within the established ADI. Many is not the majority.
- WHO's Reassessment: In 2023, the WHO re-evaluated aspartame, considering new research. While it maintained that aspartame is safe within the ADI, it also classified it as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" based on limited evidence. This classification means there is some evidence, but it’s not strong or consistent enough to conclusively prove a cancer link.
- Industry Influence Concerns: There have been concerns about industry influence on regulatory agencies and the potential for conflicts of interest. Some critics argue that the food and beverage industry, which heavily relies on artificial sweeteners like aspartame, may exert pressure on regulatory bodies. However, these agencies often have strict guidelines and processes to minimize such influence, though skepticism remains.
2. Increasing Evidence of Potential Risks
- Emerging Research: Over the years, some studies have raised concerns about aspartame's safety, particularly its potential link to cancer, neurological issues, and metabolic effects. While many of these studies are inconclusive or conflicting, they have prompted calls for more rigorous and independent research to fully understand aspartame's long-term health impacts.
- Public Health Debate: The WHO's recent reassessment reflects a growing acknowledgment that more research is needed. The classification as "possibly carcinogenic" signals a precautionary approach, urging caution while acknowledging that the evidence is not yet strong enough to warrant a ban or more stringent regulations.
3. The Reality of Scientific Uncertainty
Science is an evolving field. The reclassification of aspartame by the WHO to “possibly carcinogenic” suggests that while the evidence is not conclusive, there is enough concern to warrant further investigation. This is similar to how our understanding of tobacco risks evolved over time, moving from a period of skepticism to widespread recognition of its dangers.
Science is an evolving field. The reclassification of aspartame by the WHO to “possibly carcinogenic” suggests that while the evidence is not conclusive, there is enough concern to warrant further investigation. This is similar to how our understanding of tobacco risks evolved over time, moving from a period of skepticism to widespread recognition of its dangers.
4. Observational study in France
While numerous studies have determined aspartame to be safe in moderation, some research has linked aspartame consumption to cancer. One observational study of more than 100,000 adults in France concluded that individuals who consumed larger amounts of artificial sweeteners, especially aspartame, had a slightly elevated risk of cancer.
While numerous studies have determined aspartame to be safe in moderation, some research has linked aspartame consumption to cancer. One observational study of more than 100,000 adults in France concluded that individuals who consumed larger amounts of artificial sweeteners, especially aspartame, had a slightly elevated risk of cancer.
Deception strategy
|
Most people only read the headlines.
This is part of the deliberate deception that has been going on since the late 1800's and early 1900's. Clever marketing. The pharmaceutical and later the food and beverage industry have been using their weight and power to influence legislation world wide. We all know by now what game the tobacco industry played and is playing again with the electronic cigarette. |
Link to the article on the website of The Telegraph
|
Artificial sweeteners, your brain and your microbiome:
However, there is growing evidence over the last decade that these sweeteners can alter healthy metabolic processes in other ways, specifically in the gut.
Long-term use of these sweeteners has been associated with a higher risk of Type 2 diabetes. Sweeteners, such as saccharin, have been shown to change the type and function of the gut microbiome, the community of microorganisms that live in the intestine. Aspartame decreases the activity of a gut enzyme that is normally protective against Type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, this response may be exacerbated by the “mismatch” between the body perceiving something as tasting sweet and the expected associated calories. The greater the discrepancy between the sweetness and actual caloric content, the greater the metabolic dysregulation.
However, there is growing evidence over the last decade that these sweeteners can alter healthy metabolic processes in other ways, specifically in the gut.
Long-term use of these sweeteners has been associated with a higher risk of Type 2 diabetes. Sweeteners, such as saccharin, have been shown to change the type and function of the gut microbiome, the community of microorganisms that live in the intestine. Aspartame decreases the activity of a gut enzyme that is normally protective against Type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, this response may be exacerbated by the “mismatch” between the body perceiving something as tasting sweet and the expected associated calories. The greater the discrepancy between the sweetness and actual caloric content, the greater the metabolic dysregulation.
The FDA disagrees with the IARC on the classification of Aspartame as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”
The FDA is aware of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) conclusions about aspartame issued July 14, 2023. Aspartame being labeled by IARC as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” does not mean that aspartame is actually linked to cancer.
The FDA disagrees with IARC’s conclusion that these studies support classifying aspartame as a possible carcinogen to humans. FDA scientists reviewed the scientific information included in IARC’s review in 2021 when it was first made available and identified significant shortcomings in the studies on which IARC relied. We note that JECFA did not raise safety concerns for aspartame under the current levels of use and did not change the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI).
Full article here.
The FDA is aware of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) conclusions about aspartame issued July 14, 2023. Aspartame being labeled by IARC as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” does not mean that aspartame is actually linked to cancer.
The FDA disagrees with IARC’s conclusion that these studies support classifying aspartame as a possible carcinogen to humans. FDA scientists reviewed the scientific information included in IARC’s review in 2021 when it was first made available and identified significant shortcomings in the studies on which IARC relied. We note that JECFA did not raise safety concerns for aspartame under the current levels of use and did not change the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI).
Full article here.
Products containing Aspartame
Below are some food and beverage companies that mention aspartame on their product label:
Health professionals on the subject of artificial sweeteners
Below you'll find several videos on the subject of artificial sweeteners from both Dr. Sten Ekberg and Dr. Eric Berg DC.
YouTube may not want you to see their content as they are not favorable to its advertizers. But the lnks do work even if they don't show a picture.
I'm also adding links to their websites and YouTube channels:
YouTube may not want you to see their content as they are not favorable to its advertizers. But the lnks do work even if they don't show a picture.
I'm also adding links to their websites and YouTube channels:
|
Dr. Sten Ekberg:
Wellness For Life 5920 Odell St Cumming GA 30040 Website: http://www.DrEkberg.com On YouTube |
Dr. Eric Berg DC
On YouTube Facebook: https://bit.ly/FB-DrBerg Instagram: https://bit.ly/IG-DrBerg Listen to my podcast: https://bit.ly/drberg-podcast TikTok: https://bit.ly/TikTok-DrBergm: |
|
Top 10 Best Sweeteners & 10 Worst (Ultimate Guide)
by Dr. Sten Ekberg. (Link works, just click it) |
Diet Soda can Cause a Fatty Liver
by Dr. Eric Berg DC |
